william wrote:
> Chris Robertson wrote:
>> william wrote:
>>> i would assigh 12GB memcache and four disks with diskd to each instance.
>>
>>
>> Last I heard, diskd was not the recommended cache_dir algorithm under
>> Linux. If you are looking for maximum performance, Squid 2.7 with a
>> combination of COSS and aufs is the current route to take. On the
>> other hand, the 3.1 branch of Squid is where the majority of
>> development effort is being focused.
>>
> I thought about diskd for some threading. But if COSS is the way to go i
> will set that up.
> I also think about squid 3.1 because of the nice features implemented.
>
3.1 does not provide COSS and is still a little bit slower than 2.7.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE21 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.15Received on Sat Jan 23 2010 - 05:21:33 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 23 2010 - 12:00:05 MST