Re: [squid-users] SSLBump.. could it be used for transparent proxying?

Alex,

Thank you... for the inmense amount of users who have been waiting
years.. is there any opportunity that you can release a patch to the
stable version for this feature to be enabled.. so that we dont have
to compile the 3.1 beta?

Do you know of any opensource alternatives to this solution?

Thank you.

Dimitri

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Alex Rousskov
<rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> On 01/13/2010 10:30 AM, Dimitri Syuoul wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Ive been reading over this new feature. It is unclear to me if this
>> can be used for transparently proxying SSL (by this I mean not
>> configuring any proxy in the computers of the clients.. it is ok if
>> clients get cert warnings).
>
> Yes, SSL Bump can be used in a transparent environment.
>
> Due to a large number of certificate warnings, complex sites that use
> multiple secure servers on one page are barely usable without dynamic
> SSL certificate generation though.
>
> HTH,
>
> Alex.
>
Received on Wed Jan 20 2010 - 00:57:10 MST