Re: [squid-users] Re: SSBump.. could it be used for transparent proxying?

I dont think it is meant for caching, i intent to use it for
transparent proxying and setting up allowed list of https sites.

Could somebdy englighten us?

Thanks

On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Ritter, Nicholas
<Nicholas.Ritter_at_americantv.com> wrote:
> I am not positive, but pretty sure that SSLBump is not supported with transparent caching. If it is, I would love to make use of it as well.
>
> Nick
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimitri Syuoul [mailto:dsyuoul_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Sat 1/16/2010 5:30 PM
> To: squid-users
> Subject: [squid-users] Re: SSBump.. could it be used for transparent proxying?
>
> Hello,
>
> I submitted the response below but for some reason nobody appears to
> have commented on this. Is this feature still in beta mode that there
> isnt much doc about it?
>
> Thank you
>
> Dimitri
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Dimitri Syuoul <dsyuoul_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Ive been reading over this new feature. It is unclear to me if this
>> can be used for transparently proxying SSL (by this I mean not
>> configuring any proxy in the computers of the clients.. it is ok if
>> clients get cert warnings).
>>
>> Thank you.
>> Dimitri
>>
>
>
>
Received on Sun Jan 17 2010 - 07:11:04 MST