Re: [squid-users] squid 3.0

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:10:41 +1200

On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:31:52 +0530, vikas rawat <rawat.vikas_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks, if i have both squid2.6 and squid3.0 than which would run. I
> mean when i will give (service squid start) which version of squid
> run. if i want to run squid3.0 what specific command to be fire.

Whatever directory path and binary name you installed Squid-3.0 as.

Also please if you are upgrading, go to the highest version (currently
stable 19) available of the release being upgraded to. 3.0 has major
security bugs all the way up to STABLE 18. And some big NTLM helper issues
you may hit in anything older than 3.0.STABLE19.

Amos

>
>
> vikas
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Jefferson Diego
> <jeffersondiego8_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Em 21-09-2009 14:04, vikas rawat escreveu:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am using squid2.6.STABLE6-3.el5 on RHEL5.0, want to update with
>>> squid-3.0.STABLE9. could you guide me how to do that.
>>>
>>> 1. Shoudl i remove squid2.6 first and then install squid3.0. ?
>>> 2. Or should install squid3.0 w/o remove squid2.6. ?
>>> 3. Can i have both?
>>> 4. Is there any other best alternate.
>>>
>>> squid2.6 is working fince but facing problem to connecting FTP sites
>>> on IE7 and authentication with Active Directory.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Vikas
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 1. Not really. You can install squid3.0 in another directory (not in
>> /usr/bin) and keep squid2.6...
>> 2. You decide...
>> 3. Yes, you can.
>>
Received on Tue Sep 22 2009 - 04:10:47 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 22 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT