Re: [squid-users] Antwort: Re: [squid-users] memory usage for squid-3.0.STABLE15

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_fantomas.sk>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:18:16 +0200

On 30.06.09 13:13, Martin.Pichlmaier_at_continental-corporation.com wrote:
> I checked -- cached objects are not re-checked, at least not with two or
> three hours.
>
> But the memory usage is higher still without icap while the cache is still
> filling -- but this may due to the fact that I configured squid to cache
> objects only up to 1 MB and icap scans larger objects, too.
>
> Additionally squid does not know the icap scan limit, therefore every file
> will be sent to the ICAP server. So the higher memory usage will be
> probably the need of caching large objects, too, at least until ICAP has
> them scanned. Your thought with the two memory buffers may be another
> reason.
>
> OK, thank you, now I understand more clearly the extensive memory usage
> with ICAP. I will have to rethink whether ICAP is really the best way for
> what I want.

Well, I cache bigger files than 1MB, my maximum_object_size is 32 MB now.
with LFUDA policy I found this to have better byte hit rate...

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
A day without sunshine is like, night.
Received on Wed Jul 01 2009 - 08:18:22 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 12:00:04 MDT