Re: [squid-users] position of Proxy-Authorization header (ICAP)

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:06:08 +1200

kdsaeoiatt_at_yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> Dear Amos,
>
> Thank you for your advice,
>
> Then, "Proxy-Authorization" is in "not the encapsulated message" in my 2nd mail(squid3.0 STABLE13) .
> I think this conforms to RFC and this is not bug,
> and Your opinion is also the same ?
>
> I look for the report of bugs .
> I guess the bug to have been corrected with STABLE2-STABLE4.
> Because "Proxy-Authorization" was in "the encapsulated message" at STABLE1, and not STABLE4.
>
> --------------------------------------
> Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
> http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/

Right. You are right. The current behavior is RFC compliant.
I don't know what I was thinking. Just have to plead too much work and
no sleep :(

Amos

-- 
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE15
  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.8 or 3.0.STABLE16-RC1
Received on Tue Jun 02 2009 - 10:06:14 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 02 2009 - 12:00:01 MDT