Better to take help of open DNS
Sent from my iPhone
On 28-Mar-09, at 10:56 PM, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz <luis.daniel.lucio_at_gmail.com
> wrote:
> You should set an expresión for that URL. Use regexp like this
> ^http://.......sites=.*\.com
> I think
> On Saturday 28 March 2009 09:14:26 Truth Seeker wrote:
>> Dear Marcus,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply... But its not working for me. The thing is
>> my acl
>> will not block www.example.com. it will only block
>> www.example.com/something.com, because i am using urlpath_regex
>> instead of
>> url_regex in the acl declaration.
>>
>> Then i tried your regex also, but its not working for my problem.
>>
>> My situation is,
>>
>> sensex.com is working, but when this site redirect to
>> http://landing.domainsponsor.com/oplatum.plmna/sites=www.someother.com
>> , it
>> is not working, because this URL path is ending with .com
>>
>> Is there any workaround for this...???
>>
>> Hope now my Q is more clear...
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> --
>> ---
>> Always try to find truth!!!
>>
>> ------------***---------------***--------------***------------
>>
>> Its always nice to know that people with no understanding of
>> technologies
>> want to evaluate technical professionals based on their own lack of
>> knowledge
>>
>> ------------***---------------***--------------***------------
>>
>> --- On Sat, 3/28/09, Marcus Kool <marcus.kool_at_urlfilterdb.com> wrote:
>>> From: Marcus Kool <marcus.kool_at_urlfilterdb.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] .com extension blocking causing
>>> blocking of
>>> redirecting URL's To: "Truth Seeker" <truth_seeker_3535_at_yahoo.com>
>>> Cc: "Squid maillist" <squid-users_at_squid-cache.org>
>>> Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009, 1:53 PM
>>> The ACL blocks URLs that end with
>>> .com
>>> i.e. it blocks a URL which is www.example.com while it does
>>> not block www.example.com/index.html
>>>
>>> If you change the patterns to include a slash you are
>>> fine.
>>> The slash must prevent that domains with .com are matched.
>>> e.g.
>>> ..*\.com$ becomes .*\..*/.*\.com$
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>> Truth Seeker wrote:
>>>> Hi Techies,
>>>>
>>>> I have an acl which blocks download of file with
>>>
>>> harmful extension's. like .exe, .bat, .com, etc. This rule
>>> is working fine. the following is the details of it;
>>>
>>>> ### Blocking of Dangerous extensions to certain
>>>
>>> groups
>>>
>>>> acl dangerous_extension urlpath_regex -i
>>>
>>> "/etc/squid/include-files/dangerous_ext
>>>
>>>> ension.squid"
>>>> http_access allow vip_acl dangerous_extension
>>>> http_access allow power_acl dangerous_extension
>>>> http_access allow ultimate_acl dangerous_extension
>>>> http_access allow download_surfers_acl
>>>
>>> dangerous_extension
>>>
>>>> http_access deny dangerous_extension
>>>> deny_info ERR_DANGEROUS_ESTENSIONS
>>>
>>> dangerous_extension
>>>
>>>> # cat
>>>
>>> /etc/squid/include-files/dangerous_extension.squid
>>> ..*\.exe$
>>>
>>>> ..*\.com$
>>>> ..*\.vb$
>>>> ..*\.vbs$
>>>> ..*\.vbe$
>>>> ..*\.cmd$
>>>> ..*\.bat$
>>>> ..*\.ws$
>>>> ..*\.wsf$
>>>> ..*\.scr$
>>>> ..*\.shs$
>>>> ..*\.pif$
>>>> ..*\.hta$
>>>> ..*\.jar$
>>>> ..*\..js$
>>>> ..*\.jse$
>>>> ..*\.lnk$
>>>> ..*\.mov$
>>>> ..*\.3gp$
>>>> ...*\.avi$
>>>> ..*\.rar$
>>>> ..*\.zip$
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If there is a site which redirect traffic to another
>>>
>>> .com site, will cause to trigger the above rule, which will
>>> result in failure of a legitimate request. How can i do a
>>> workaround on this issue???
>>>
>>>> Thanks in Advance...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> --
>>>> ---
>>>> Always try to find truth!!!
>>>
>>> ------------***---------------***--------------***------------
>>>
>>>> Its always nice to know that people with no
>>>
>>> understanding of technologies want to evaluate technical
>>> professionals based on their own lack of knowledge
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------***---------------***--------------***------------
>>>
>>>>
>
>
Received on Sat Mar 28 2009 - 19:57:55 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Mar 29 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT