The Doctor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:52:58PM +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> Using 3.1.0.6
>>>
>>> What has changed between 0308 and today?
>>>
>>> I compiled today's release and got no access complains and had to switch
>>> back
>>> to 20090308?
>>>
>>> What happened?
>> Sorry about that. We can only assure that is builds. The run-time behavior
>> is not as well auto-tested as we would like. (volunteers for adding unit
>> tests?)
>>
>> Quite a lot of code shuffling is going on this month. Some of it is
>> bringing out C++ linkage oddities. The worst of them are hitting 3.HEAD,
>> but some has leaked into 3.1 snapshots.
>>
>> We are working really hard on locating all of the current issues and
>> fixing/testing in HEAD before porting the results back to 3.1.
>>
>> Amos
>>
>>
>
> I understand however 08 to 25 is about 17 itereations.
Just a few. I only do maintenance back-ports weekly, and there was a
build error preventing any snapshot for a while too.
>
> Unlike OPenSLL and INN which I grab the daily releases,
> I have not incorporated this into squid.
>
> The problem was that remote client could not proxy yesterday when
> I grabbed the 20090325 package and
> that forced me to switch back to 3.0.1.6 - 20080308 .
>
>
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6Received on Thu Mar 26 2009 - 13:32:25 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 26 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT