I'm still not sure whether the correct behaviour is to send ICP for
the rewritten URL, or to rewrite the URLs being received before
they're looked up.
Hm!
Adrian
2008/12/24 Imri Zvik <imriz_at_bsd.org.il>:
> On Wednesday 24 December 2008 17:01:39 Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Thanks. Be sure to comment on the bugzilla ticket too.
>>
>> Oh and tell me which bug it is so I can make sure I'm watching it. :)
>>
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>> 2008/12/23 Imri Zvik <imriz_at_bsd.org.il>:
>> > On Sunday 21 December 2008 10:52:42 Imri Zvik wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Thursday 18 December 2008 21:57:22 Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> >> > Nope, I don't think the storeurl-rewriter stuff was ever integrated
>> >> > into ICP.
>> >> >
>> >> > I think someone posted a patch to the squid bugzilla to implement
>> >> > this.
>> >>
>> >> If you can point me to said patch, I'd be happy to test it under load.
>> >>
>> >> > I'm happy to commit whatever people sensibly code up and deploy. :)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Adrian
>> >> >
>> >> > 2008/12/18 Imri Zvik <imriz_at_bsd.org.il>:
>> >> > > Hi,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I'm using the storeurl_rewrite feature to store content with
>> >> > > changing attributes.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > As my traffic grows, I want to be able to add cache_peers to share
>> >> > > the load.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > After configuring the peers, I've found out that all my ICP queries
>> >> > > results with misses.
>> >> > > It seems like the storeurl_rewrite logic is not implemented in the
>> >> > > ICP queries - i.e., nor the ICP client or the server passes the URL
>> >> > > through the storeurl_rewrite process before checking if the
>> >> > > requested content is cached or not.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Am I missing something?
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thank you in advance,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >
>> > I've found the said patch in squid's bugzilla - It seems to be working,
>> > but I'm going to test the patch under load (700 mbit~) and report back.
>
> Here is the bug report: http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2354
>
> The patch works flawlessly so far.
>
>
Received on Thu Dec 25 2008 - 05:47:44 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 25 2008 - 12:00:06 MST