RE: [squid-users] url length limit

> Just a follow-up,
>
> Squid3 didn't work as expected for me, so I tried recompiling
> 2.6-STABLE22 with the MAX_URL changed to 8192.
>
> It's working great so far and have moved it into production with no
> issues.
>
> - Gregori
>

Okay. What was the issue with squid-3 please?

Amos

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3_at_treenet.co.nz]
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:34 AM
> To: Gregori Parker
> Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] url length limit
>
>> It has been tried at 8192 with no sign of trouble in Squid-3.
>> If your URL get much large than that, we really do need it checked up
> as
>>
>> high as 128KB so feel free to build with larger values, just please
>> report back how it goes (particularly if good news).
>> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2267
>>
>> I'd suggest experimenting with squid 3.1.0.1 to see if its usable in
>> your setup. The URL limits have been raised to 8KB already and
> diskless
>> operation is much more polished and native.
>>
>>
>> As for logging the URI, most things in squid are dropped when they are
>
>> found to overflow the buffers like that. The details may be logged to
>
>> cache.log when debug_options is set to the right section and level.
> I'm
>> not sure right now which one is relevant to 2.6 though, there are a
> few
>> available.
>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/DebugSections
>>
>>
>> Amos
>
>
Received on Wed Nov 12 2008 - 01:40:17 MST