Just a follow-up,
Squid3 didn't work as expected for me, so I tried recompiling
2.6-STABLE22 with the MAX_URL changed to 8192.
It's working great so far and have moved it into production with no
issues.
- Gregori
-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3_at_treenet.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:34 AM
To: Gregori Parker
Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] url length limit
> It has been tried at 8192 with no sign of trouble in Squid-3.
> If your URL get much large than that, we really do need it checked up
as
>
> high as 128KB so feel free to build with larger values, just please
> report back how it goes (particularly if good news).
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2267
>
> I'd suggest experimenting with squid 3.1.0.1 to see if its usable in
> your setup. The URL limits have been raised to 8KB already and
diskless
> operation is much more polished and native.
>
>
> As for logging the URI, most things in squid are dropped when they are
> found to overflow the buffers like that. The details may be logged to
> cache.log when debug_options is set to the right section and level.
I'm
> not sure right now which one is relevant to 2.6 though, there are a
few
> available.
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/DebugSections
>
>
> Amos
Received on Tue Nov 11 2008 - 18:14:51 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 11 2008 - 12:00:02 MST