Re: [squid-users] Expires: vs. Cache-Control: max-age

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:55:13 +1000

On 02/10/2008, at 3:37 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>
>> I.e., the max-age cache-control directive takes precedence over
>> Expires.
>> I've tested Squid and a number of other caches with Co-Advisor, and
>> if
>> Expires indicates the response is fresh, but CC: max-age says it's
>> stale, it will treat it as stale, for just about any given cache.
>> Unfortunately, Co-Advisor doesn't test the reverse situation,
>> although
>> I may have overlooked it (Alex?).
>
> I am sorry, I am not sure what you mean by the "reverse situation".
> Expires indicates stale but max-age says fresh? If not, can you
> specify
> it explicitly?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alex.

Yes, that's it.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
Received on Thu Oct 02 2008 - 05:56:55 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 02 2008 - 12:00:02 MDT