Re: [squid-users] Squid requirements

From: Josh Haft <pacmansyu_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:01:30 -0500

My most recent setup was on an old Compaq desktop server 1100mhz, 1gb
RAM (not sure of speed) with ~30gb cache on 10k rpm SCSI disks.

Squid was auth-ing against Samba using the winbind helper. No AV, but
dansguardian was used for content filtering. Performance was adequate
for ~100 users.

Josh

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Richard Hubbell
<richard_hubbe11_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Wed, 7/16/08, Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org>
>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid requirements
>> To: "Chris Robertson" <crobertson_at_gci.net>
>> Cc: "Squid Users" <squid-users_at_squid-cache.org>
>> Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 9:28 AM
>> What we're really missing is a bunch of "hardware
>> x, config y, testing
>> z, results a, b, c." TMF used to have some stuff up
>> for older hardware
>> but there's just nothing recent to use as a measuring
>> stick..
>>
>
> The problem is that there's so much disparate technology out there.
> multi-core cpus, all kinds of different memory, all kinds of different disk technologies, different filesystems, different OS, different kernels, and on and on. It's hard to get useful measuring sticks.
>
> I still think it's a useful pursuit. But I think that the reasons above make people less inclined to do it.
>
> spec.org tries to level the field, if someone concocted a level field and made it easy for people to do, then we'd see more results.
>
>
>
>
Received on Wed Jul 16 2008 - 23:01:33 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 17 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT