Re: [squid-users] Combined log showing 0/0 for status/bytes?

Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
>> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm running "squid/2.6.STABLE20+ICAP" via WCCP2. I seem to be
>>> getting more and more instances of :
>>>
>>> 192.168.3.249 - - [05/Jul/2008:19:08:44 -0400] "GET http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v43/18/2433486906/app_2_2433486906_3650.gif HTTP/1.1" 0 0 "http://www.facebook.com/home.php?" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" TCP_HIT:DIRECT
>>>
>>> 192.168.3.249 - - [05/Jul/2008:19:08:44 -0400] "GET http://profile.ak.facebook.com/v230/847/104/q748084879_3980.jpg HTTP/1.1" 0 0 "http://www.facebook.com/home.php?" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" TCP_MISS:DIRECT
>>>
>>>
>>> 0 status and 0 bytes sent. Is this something that just "happens" ?
>>> (193 out of 2909 hits yesterday)
>>>
>>> Thanks, Tuc
>> Hey Tuc, what were the requirements that still hold you to 2.6? Just
>> speed performance or something else?
>>
> Well, I'd say "squid FreeBSD Ports", but I should be at 2.6.21
> then. I don't see 2.7 there, so thats my reason for 2.7. "squid30" is
> at 3.0.7, so for that I plead insanity. Actually, this site has had some
> many other problems in the last few months, coming up to speed on
> versions has been taken off the list of "TODO". Though, if your saying
> I get speed/performance with 2.6 over the others... Then I guess I'm not
> too worried.

You do, 2.6/2.7 are approx 25% faster than 3.0.

I thought you may have been one of those who are stuck with 2.6+ICAP
because of other missing features in 3.0. I'm on track to push those
ahead now if any others are brought to my attention.

I see from the other posts that you may not actually be using the ICAP
feature.

  - If you are not actually needing it, I'd advise dropping the patch
from your 2.x squid. Some of your problems may be attributable to the
incomplete nature of the 2.6 ICAP patch.

  - If ICAP is important to you, you should have 3.0 on your planning
list for testing, as the stability and support for ICAP in 3.x is very
much better.

Amos

-- 
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE3 or 3.0.STABLE7