tis 2008-05-27 klockan 10:41 -0400 skrev Troy:
> A few days ago we had our squid proxy fail over to a backup
> cache_peer. We are not sure what caused it to fail but it did not
> fall back to the primary cache_peer. I thought I had read about a bug
> that had been reported about this but not sure what it was or the bug
> number. I would like to know if there is a way to monitor the
> cache_peer directive and what cache_peer the proxy is using.
bug #1972, fixed in 2.6.STABLE15.
Workaround until upgraded: Use the monitorurl feature.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue May 27 2008 - 21:28:14 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 05 2008 - 01:05:14 MDT