On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 10:18 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> At the end of the day, I'd rather see something that an increasing number of people
> on the Internet will use and - I won't lie here - whatever creates a self sustaining
> project, both from community and financial perspectives.
I agree with this. FWIW I see squid 2 and 3 as very similar to apache
1.x and 2.x - apache 2 took a _long_ time to be considered an 'upgrade'
by _all_ users, and squid3 has been in the same boat.
I don't think that the amount of work to make squid3 better for all
users is insurmountable by the community, and I think that continuing
the polish on squid3 is the best way forward. YMMV of course :).
-Rob
-- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 13:00:05 MDT