Re: [squid-users] Squid-2, Squid-3, roadmap

Dodd, Tony wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@yahoo-inc.com]
>>
>> Well, that's a bit of a straw-man, isn't it? AIUI 3 *is* already 2 re-
>> coded into C++. Never mind the question of why that's necessary;
>> indeed, I think a lot of people's discomfort is centred on the fact
>> that large parts of 3 have been rewritten and not battle-tested in
>> wide deployment.
>
> Some of my discomfort stems from the fact that from where I sit,
> development on -3 seems entirely ad-hoc, with no direction; whereas -2
> development is entirely focused (of course, with only Adrian really
> developing it, it's going to be moreso; what I'm talking about is more
> 'what is being developed' than 'who's developing it' though). I could
> be talking entirely out of turn here though, as I haven't seen a -3
> roadmap.

Thats one thing thats immediately fixable:
   http://wiki.squid-cache.org/RoadMap/Squid3

Amos

-- 
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.