Re: [squid-users] acl definitions and delay_pools

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:46:56 +0200

On fre, 2007-09-21 at 19:20 -0600, kevin@uveais.ca wrote:

> send in plain text only. No idea why it came up with all that HTML. Forgive
> me if it happens again. I sent the following:

Looks better..

> The config which I hope will work follows. It seems no one is using the
> bandwidth right now (Friday, I guess) and have late results which are
> positive from someone in the "fast" pool. So, does the following acl and
> delay pool definitions look OK?? (Thanks in advance; Kevin):
>
>
> acl fast src 192.168.3.1-192.168.3.79/255.255.255.0
> acl medium src 192.168.3.80-192.168.3.120/255.255.255.0
> acl slow src 192.168.3.200-192.168.3.250/255.255.255.0

Drop the netmasks from those. Not doing what you want. (see output of
"squid -k parse")

Other than that is looks fine.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Wed Sep 26 2007 - 02:47:06 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Oct 01 2007 - 12:00:03 MDT