Re: [squid-users] Squid as Acceleration Proxy in a Squid Cluster

1. your cache sibling configuration is wrong; you're not contacting
any of the sibling.
2. use the proxy-only flag if you don't want squid to store cache
hits from the siblings.

try something like

cache_peer sibling1 sibling 80 3130 proxy-only no-delay allow-miss
name=sibling1

mike

At 03:02 PM 5/9/2007, Marcel Alburg wrote:
>Hello,
>
>my Networks looks like
>
>
> Internet
> |
> [LB] -ha- [LB]
> | |
> +-------------------------------------+
> | |
> | |
> [Squid + Apache] [Squid + Apache]
>
>
>All Hosts has running a webserver at 127.0.0.1:80 and a squid at the
>official IP Adresse on Port 80.
>
>The LoadBalancer ([LB]) forward the request to on of the server. The
>Squid checks his Cache and it the cache valid he send from cache
>otherwise he ask the local apache.
>
>We've a lot of hosts with this configuration and we've a problem, that
>any squid cache his own version from a webpage (n-Nodes could be n
>different Versions from a webpage - because the access and
>generationtime differs).
>
>My question is. It is possible to let ask the Squid the other nodes in
>the network if the requested page cached. And has any node a cached
>version - than deliver this cached version - otherwise ask the local apache.
>
>I tried a lot of different configs but nothing works to my contentment.
>
>a other problem is:
>
>If ask the squid the local page and gets an Error 404 or 500 he should
>ask the other Proxies for any valid cached version and deliver that
>version. The Webuser should not see the 500 Errors (if we had a lot of
>load at the server, the error 500 pages comes often).
>
>And i wanna stop the local apache at one node and the squid should
>notice that and ask the other nodes.
>
>One of my not working config was like this
>
>cache_peer 127.0.0.1 parent 80 0 originserver no-query default
>allow-miss
>cache_peer 127.0.0.1 sibling 80 3130
>cache_peer 127.0.0.1 sibling 80 3130
>cache_peer 127.0.0.1 sibling 80 3130
>icp_hit_stale on
>
>
>It is possible to realized that ?
>
>Thanks
>
>Marcel
Received on Wed May 09 2007 - 16:09:30 MDT