Re: [squid-users] tproxy performance overhead ?

From: Edinilson J. Santos <edinilson@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:57:45 -0200

I'm using tproxy with the following configuration (without problems):

Dual Xeon 2.4 Ghz, 4gb RAM, 2 SCSI 72gb 160mb/s
Debian with Kernel 2.6.18 + tproxy for this kernel
Squid 2.6 Stable 5 compiled with the following options:
Squid Cache: Version 2.6.STABLE5
configure options: '--prefix=/usr/local/squid'
'--enable-storeio=coss,ufs,aufs' '--enable-removal-policies=lru,heap'
'--enable-snmp' '--enable-default-err-language=Portuguese'
'--enable-linux-netfilter' '--disable-hostname-checks'
'--enable-underscores' '--enable-epoll' '--enable-linux-tproxy'
'--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for' '--enable-coss-aio-ops'
'--with-large-files'

Edinilson
---------------------------------------------------------
ATINET-Professional Web Hosting
Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: "Alexandre Correa" <alexandre@sabbath.com.br>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] tproxy performance overhead ?

On Thu, Dec 07, 2006, Alexandre Correa wrote:
> tproxy not work for me
>
> my four proxies servers using kernel compiled with tproxy, 64 bits for
> EMT64 ... server crash after 3 hours +- .... kernel 2.6.18.5

You're going to have to be a little more specific with "server crash".

Does anyone have tproxy working on this kind of configuration?

Adrian

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid 
Support -
Received on Fri Dec 08 2006 - 05:57:59 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Jan 01 2007 - 12:00:01 MST