Re: [squid-users] tproxy performance overhead ?

tproxy not work for me

my four proxies servers using kernel compiled with tproxy, 64 bits for
EMT64 ... server crash after 3 hours +- .... kernel 2.6.18.5

On 12/7/06, Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006, Pranav Desai wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Does anyone have any numbers on how much overhead tproxy will add ?
> > Basically, how much drop in performance would we see if tproxy is
> > enabled.
> >
> > I imagine that tproxy will have to do some lookup and hence should
> > incur some overhead.
> > I also looked at the tproxy mailing list
> > https://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/tproxy/2005-February/000167.html
> > and it seems to suggest that tproxy is not doing very well.
> >
> > I am also trying a setup myself.
> >
> > (192.168.1.201)
> > client ----------- proxy ----------- server (10.51.6.197)
> > eth0 (10.51.6.102)
> > eth1 (192.168.1.102)
> >
> > * There is no direct link between the server and the client.
> > * The servers' default gw is the proxy, and the proxy has forwading on.
> > * Polymix4 running on the client & server.
> > * I dont have any sticky load balancer or routers, hence i am doing this
> > setup.
>
> That sounds about right. Just have the proxy as the default gateway
> for the client and server.
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
>

-- 
Sds.
Alexandre J. Correa
Onda Internet / OPinguim.net
http://www.ondainternet.com.br
http://www.opinguim.net