Re: [squid-users] Re: Upcoming Squid-2.6 work

Adrian, no bugs so far.
I have a little increase in the overall cpu usage ~6%, but also a
little decrease in response times ~5%
This is My setup
Running as accelerator. 69% hit ratio, 93% byte Ratio, ~30 Req/s
 2 x 2.8 Ghz Xeon (HT disabled), Redhat ES 4 Update 4
2 x cache_dir aufs 80% free space
access_log none
store_log none
these are my compile options.

--prefix=/usr/local/squid\
--enable-async-io=64\
--enable-storeio=ufs,aufs,coss,null\
--enable-useragent-log\
--enable-referer-log\
--enable-snmp\
--enable-epoll\
--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for\
--enable-x-accelerator-vary\
--with-maxfd=20480

Regards, Pablo

On 11/30/06, Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm going to spend the next few weeks slowly bringing over the patches
> > I've written in my parserwork SF branch. I'll start with patches which
> > reduce pressure on the memory allocator and then move onto incorporating
> > the request line pand client-side parser changes I made to Squid-3 a few
> > weeks ago.
>
> The first part of this work has been completed. Henrik has plans to roll
> another Squid-2.6 stable release soon so please let us know if you're able
> to update to the latest squid-2.6 snapshot (tomorrow's should have the
> changes I've just made) and let us know if there's any further issues.
> Running the snapshot images will help us find and fix bugs before the next
> release.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - Hosting and Commercial Squid Support -
>
Received on Mon Dec 04 2006 - 08:04:41 MST