> I see what you're indicating now. So if the ultimate redirect "should
> be cacheable" (according to caching law!) then it will be cached by
> Squid?
>
Yes.
> So why am i not seeing that behaviour with the redirector?
>
>
Verify SQUID's access.log for the relevant requests, watch the
'store status'
M.
Received on Tue Oct 24 2006 - 13:40:20 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MST