The tricky part of doing that, I think, is that to make this useful
(e.g., to a reverse proxy), it'd be necessary to share invalidations
between cache peers, which I think would require an extension to ICP.
On 2006/10/20, at 2:38 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tor 2006-10-19 klockan 17:19 -0700 skrev Mark Nottingham:
>
>> Overall, caching POST responses would be nice. If I were
>> prioritising, however, I'd be much more excited about getting Squid
>> conformant to section 13.10 (invalidations from side effects).
>
> Fully argreed.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
-- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.comReceived on Fri Oct 20 2006 - 11:33:10 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MST