Re: [squid-users] POST cacheability

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:32:45 -0700

The tricky part of doing that, I think, is that to make this useful
(e.g., to a reverse proxy), it'd be necessary to share invalidations
between cache peers, which I think would require an extension to ICP.

On 2006/10/20, at 2:38 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> tor 2006-10-19 klockan 17:19 -0700 skrev Mark Nottingham:
>
>> Overall, caching POST responses would be nice. If I were
>> prioritising, however, I'd be much more excited about getting Squid
>> conformant to section 13.10 (invalidations from side effects).
>
> Fully argreed.
>
> Regards
> Henrik

--
Mark Nottingham
mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Fri Oct 20 2006 - 11:33:10 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MST