Re: [squid-users] Why HTTP/1.0 and not HTTP/1.1?

From: W. Tait Cyrus <tait.cyrus@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:31:58 -0600

Yes it can be argued that the app is broken since it won't accept
HTTP/1.0 replies (and I'll report this as a bug to the vendor).

What harm is there in my changing squid to report HTTP/1.1 instead of
1.0? It is either that, or look for another squidGuard compliant
transparent proxy.

++Tait
Received on Sun Sep 17 2006 - 16:32:08 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "RE: [squid-users] any special config for SNMP for squid-2.6STABLE3?"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Why HTTP/1.0 and not HTTP/1.1?"
In reply to: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Why HTTP/1.0 and not HTTP/1.1?"
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Why HTTP/1.0 and not HTTP/1.1?"
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Why HTTP/1.0 and not HTTP/1.1?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT