Re: [squid-users] 2.5 ok but 2.6 access denied

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:10:50 +0200

tis 2006-09-12 klockan 12:12 -0300 skrev HM:

> One process as transparent cache using two or more squid processes as parents
> (this is on the one server, no external cache parent).

Have you set unique_hostname uniquely on each instance?

Regards
Henrik

application/pgp-signature attachment: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel

Received on Tue Sep 12 2006 - 13:10:55 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: HM: "Re: [squid-users] 2.5 ok but 2.6 access denied"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] aufs vs diskd"
In reply to: HM: "[squid-users] 2.5 ok but 2.6 access denied"
Next in thread: HM: "Re: [squid-users] 2.5 ok but 2.6 access denied"
Reply: HM: "Re: [squid-users] 2.5 ok but 2.6 access denied"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT