RE: [squid-users] Squid and www.runescape.com

That'll teach me to just rely on the output of squid -v.
The squid RPM is a vendor package from Centos and there is a difference on
the servers. One server is running auto updates so has the newest package
but the other server has the next release down as it's not running auto
updates.
I've now updated the live server and it all seems to be fine now.

Thanks for your help :)

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:henrik@henriknordstrom.net]
Sent: 22 April 2006 00:30
To: Tony
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid and www.runescape.com

fre 2006-04-21 klockan 11:42 +0100 skrev Tony:
> I'm running version Squid-2.5.STABLE6.
>
> However I just tried the same thing on an identical server, identical in
> everyway, same hardware, same O/S, same versions of Squid etc, exactly the
> same. Even down to the options squid was compiled with, verified with
"squid
> -v".

Are you really really sure about the above?

Squid-2.5.STABLE6 does not even have the checks for this HTTP protocol
violations this site trips on (this was added in 2.5.STABLE8 and refined
in later versions), so I suspect you are not really running 2.5.STABLE6
but either a newer version or a vendor version having many backported
patches.. If you are running a vendor version then verify that the
vendor minor version of the squid package is indeed the same.. I.e. if
it's a RedHat system verify "rpm -q -f /usr/sbin/squid" reports the same
on both servers. I suspect isn't the same..

Regards
Henrik

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.