Re: [squid-users] throughput limitation from cache

Hi Peter,

Also sprach Peter Smith <peter.smith@utsouthwestern.edu> (Thu, 19 Jan
2006 15:10:05 -0600):
> Richard, I was wondering if you've gotten anywhere with this? I did
> some testing on my fairly busy squid cache.. Here are the results,
> from Squid's perspective (access.log)..

oh, I did, have a look at..

http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200601/0353.html

Well, _I_ made a bobo. I only tested aufs with 2.5STABLE6(or9?). The
aufs slowdown seems to be no more in 2.5STABLE12, while diskd gave and
still gives me ~256K/s throughput. This behavior was explained by
Henrik in..

http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200601/0338.html

I'm on aufs now even though Commited Memory raised (due to posix
threads, I assume) to over 550M on this 256M box. Didn't hurt at all yet
and a cached file comes with blasting ~7,3M/s to local clients and a bit
more to localhost. I'm _perfectly_ OK with this. :)

> [...]
> Peter

sl ritch
Received on Thu Jan 19 2006 - 15:19:13 MST