RE: [squid-users] first time builder, playing w/build options...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda W [mailto:squid-user@tlinx.org]
> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 9:25 AM
> To: Chris Robertson
> Cc: Squid Users
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] first time builder, playing w/build
> options...
>
>
> Chris Robertson wrote:
>> I have not tried compiling Squid 3, so this I'm going to be of little
help,
>> but I thought that I would point out that Squid 3 is not production
ready...
> ---
> Yes....but it's been fairly stable in day-to-day use for over a
year.
> I forget the exact reasons, but once I upgraded to 3.0 a year or two back,
I
> didn't want to go back.
>
> I wanted to try some of the other features than the standard "SuSE
9.1"
> version -- things like delay pools...also wanted to compile a version to
allow
> transparent proxying through a 2.6 based kernel. These have been "back
burner"
> projects I delve into for a while, but them drop when they start getting
too
> messy.
>
>> In any case, I think more information is probably needed. What OS are
you
>> compiling Squid on? What were the parameters you gave the configure
>> command? What version of Samba do you have installed?
> ---
> samba 3.0.9-2.6 (SuSE made). I likely didn't have the correct
headers
> installed, to get around it I just lopped off samba authentication as
don't have
> a need for authentication, anyway. Another reason to recompile it, I
suppose --
> get rid of the stuff I don't need -- and wanted to try non-blocking IO
with
> aufs instead of ufs which SuSE doesn't compile support for.
>

Does this mean that your original problem (compiling Squid 3) has been
solved?

*SNIP* Henrik did a better job of answering the remaining bits than I could
ever hope to.

> -linda
Received on Mon Jun 20 2005 - 11:11:03 MDT