> On Tue, 31 May 2005, Anders Nordby wrote:
>
> >I thought most people used diskd for performance, not aufs? Then,
> >threading is irrelevant.
On 31.05 14:11, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> aufs on Linux, diskd on *BSD.
>
> diskd also works on Linux, but aufs performs slightly better and requires
> less configuration.
>
> aufs doesn't work well on *BSD.
is this true even for FreeBSD 5? It should have good thread support even in
libc (FreeBSD 4 only in kernel, or using the linuxthreads library).
I haven't seen any comment telling "FreeBSD 5 threads are OK for aufs" nor
"FreeBSD 5 threads are not OK for aufs"...
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Atheism is a non-prophet organization.Received on Wed Jun 01 2005 - 01:13:59 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Jul 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MDT