On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Pawlowski Julian wrote:
> I'd like to know if there are some of you already working with Squid 3.0 in their production environments.
There is. But you need a pretty hard stomach when doing this. Not sure if
there is many of the Squid-3 users subscribed to squid-users however..
> I just tried to find out if there are any recommendations but I didn't find anything...
The recommendation is not to unless you have very knowledgeable staff to
help you resolving the problems which will arise.
> I read the Squid 3.0 release notes of April 20th 2003 and I think there are some interesting changes in difference to the 2.5 in it.
There is plenty of interesting changes.
The most notable for running Squid-3 development versions in production is
ESI, opening a whole new application field for Squid.
For normal proxying or acceleration the latest stable RELEASE is more
suitable, maybe with some patches from devel.squid-cache.org when the
plain STABLE release is not sufficient.
> Although the first pre-release of Squid 3 has been made many years ago,
> there isn't at least one first stable release and I woundered why. Are
> the testing purposes so hard or what exactly is the cause of this?
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200503/0042.html
the rest of the same thread is also interesting wrt this question. The
thread starts at
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200503/0032.html
Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Apr 05 2005 - 06:09:28 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun May 01 2005 - 12:00:03 MDT