>...
>...
> Frankly I really don't know if htcp is better then ICP while
> configuring
HTCP provides better security and better cache hit predictions
versus ICP. However, HTCP messages are larger and more complicated.
So they impose slightly more network overhead.
> sibling, all we want to achieve "sibling" and yes
> "proxy-only" would be
> the best coz all of the caches servers are on the same network/switch.
>
> I thinks there is some sorta lack of communication probably
> from my side
> coz I'm not native ya ;)
>
> So what you suggest may I use ICP or HTCP protocol while configuring
> cache_peer , sibling relationship b/w the cache servers.
>
You need ICP or HTCP to use siblings in a fashionable manner.
I.e. the ability for the cache 'client' to ask the sibling
whether it has the object or not.
Probably ICP will has a slighty more chance for 'false hits'.
M.
Received on Wed Mar 30 2005 - 03:56:29 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:00:03 MST