Elsen Marc wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> I'm kinda confuse what would be the best solution to
>>set sibling
>>between cache servers on the same switch/network. We have 3 cache
>>servers that we want to configure to look each other before sending
>>request out "Internet".
>>
>>
>>Secondly what the difference b/w
>>
>>1) cache_peer Mysecondcache sibling 3128 4827 htcp proxy-only
>>
>>and
>>
>>2) cache_peer Mysecondcache sibling 3128 4827 proxy-only
>>
>>
>>
>>Is there any benefit of using "htcp" instead of only using
>>"proxy only"
>>as in the second line?
>>
>>
>>
>
> - These directives are unrelated : htcp specifies a type if intercache
>communication protocol.
>
>no-proxy says that objects from the remote peer should not be saved
>locally.
>
>M.
>
>
>
>
sorry but what do you mean by "unrelated" ?
cache_peer Mysecondcache sibling 3128 4827 htcp proxy-only
3128 4827 htcp proxy-only
you mean its of no benefit to specify
3128 4827 htcp proxy-only
while configureing cache_peer?
Thanks and regards
Askar
Received on Tue Mar 29 2005 - 23:28:44 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:00:03 MST