On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Marco Crucianelli wrote:
> I've got the same problem, but playing with refresh_pattern (setting
> something different from refresh_pattern . 0 20% 1440) I could get
> many more SWAPOUT.
> Isn't it too short setting 0 as minumum fresh time for an object without
> expiry-time?!!? What would the best settings be?!!?
If you change the min to something else than 0 then you greatly increase
the risk of caching private information not supposed to be cached.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Mar 09 2005 - 06:18:05 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MST