Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.5 vs. Apache 2.0

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:11:36 +0100

On 15.02 08:05, Maya Zimerman wrote:
> I am intereasted to get and opinion/info about a comparison between two
> proxy caches: Squid and Apache in regards to performance as Web cache,
> memory requirements, s/w architecture, stability etc.

although apache supports proxying, I don't recommend it. apache is
primarily web server and doesn't have capbilities that squid has, and is
not optimised for performance as squid is.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!".
Received on Tue Feb 15 2005 - 07:11:39 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MST