RE: [squid-users] No TCP_HIT, just TCP_MISS, why?

 
>
> Elsen Marc wrote:
>
> > For stable6 make sure you are adequately patched if the
> > ufs store type is being used as Hendrik suggested :
> >
> >
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STA
BLE6-ufs_no_valid_dir
>
> How may I check wheter or not I'm in need of that patch?

That's a bit circlonized reasoning in the sense that initially
you reported a possible problem, concerning a no caching
situation for all objects.
For 2.5.stable6 this was a possible cause, to the idea is :
'take the patch' for that version and if that problem is seen.
Then test again.

>
> > Access the object from 2 different browsers on 2 different hosts.
> > In the second attempt , SQUID should 'deliver' a TCP_HIT
> ,for this object.
>
> This is what I get from my 2.5stable1 proxy from 2 different clients:
>
> 1096536941.122 214 10.167.211.11 TCP_MISS/200 491 GET
> http://www.nu.nl/img/balkje.gif boniforti
> PARENT_HIT/proxy.reteunitaria.piemonte.it image/gif
> 1096536950.325 396 10.167.211.11 TCP_MISS/304 418 GET
> http://www.nu.nl/img/balkje.gif boniforti
>...

 Make sure that you are not using browser refresh/reload during
this tests, otherwise if-modified-since is induced and you
get that behavior.

Make sure also that your system clock is 'adequately synced
to the Internet' (UTC synced, irrespective of Timezone).

M.
 
Received on Thu Sep 30 2004 - 05:48:58 MDT