Re: [squid-users] Another TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS question.

Hi,

so it it right to say that a TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS = TCP_MISS, just that we
cannot see it as anoter entry inside the access.log file. Also, we will not
know the corresponding error HTTP status code (e.g. TCP_MISS/403......).

Rgds

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@squid-cache.org>
To: "Lizzy Dizzy" <lizzy_99@hotmail.com>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Another TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS question.

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Lizzy Dizzy wrote:
>
> > Sorry, Just another question to add, so if the object is retrieved from
> > origin site, will there be another new entry inside access.log that says
> > TCP_MISS for the object that could not be found inside the cache
disk(and
> > which is subsequently requested from the origin server)?
>
> No. Only one entry in access.log. The client only sent one request, and
> Squid only made one request. It is only that Squid at first thought it had
> the object in the cache but then when trying to access the cached object
> found it not to be true, Squid then automatically continues and fetches
> the object from the Internet instead, as if the object did not exist in
> the cache.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
Received on Wed Apr 21 2004 - 19:44:43 MDT