On 31.03 16:48, Greg Swallow wrote:
> Assuming documentation at
> http://www.bowiesnyder.com/writings/caching_shtml.htm is true, my
> squid-based reverse proxies shouldn't be caching HTML documents that are
> server parsed. However, it appears that the four reverse proxies I have
> sitting in front of my webservers are?
Well, caching depends on headers like Last-Modified, Expires: and Cache:
you can make uncacheable static pages as long as cacheable dynamic pages.
I'd check all headers that client and server send, to be sure if that's a
bug, or those pages are made in the way they can be cached
(why not to cache a page that hasn't changed?)
> Also according to this documentation, I should be able to test whether
> or not Apache is responding to IMS requests by checking for HTTP 304
shouldn't that be 306?
> result codes in my webserver logs. I don't see any -- I just see 200's
> for the affected web content. I think this started happening when I
> upgraded from 2.5-stable1 to 2.5-stable4. Has anyone else run into this
> problem?
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 2B|!2B, that's a question!Received on Thu Apr 01 2004 - 01:27:27 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 12:00:01 MDT