On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Paul Seaman wrote:
> I have a PIII 1.3GHz (512MB of RAM) squid cache machine with a 160GB
> secondary drive that I was going to use for a UFS cache. Are there
> limitations on suggested cache size compared to available RAM, or will
> this work OK as a 350+ user webcache? I guess what I'm asking is if
> it'll be ok to use the full 160GB, or if I should use a smaller
> cache_dir.
See the Squid FAQ on memory usage.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Mar 08 2004 - 16:48:40 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 12:00:01 MST