On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Chris Selwyn wrote:
> But it looked like the result of the previous "default" squidGuard rule was
> not being interpreted as I expected by squid..
Or maybe squidGuard did not react as expected in response to a CONNECT
request.
> I was using a redirect in the default squidGuard rule to return http://...
> etc.etc.
> but squid was taking the bit before the : and looking that up in DNS. Hence
> it was looking up http.matson.stc.com
>
> Any clues?
CONNECT is very different from any other types or requests.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Dec 01 2003 - 16:21:36 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 12:00:03 MST