> If you have more than a few users, I would recommend using one of
> the asynchronous IO types (aufs/diskd) instead of ufs.
>
I have about 400 clients accessing the cache.
I'm using ufs.
Do you recommend aufs?
I have to recreate the cache?
Thnak you.
Received on Wed Nov 26 2003 - 00:35:14 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:21:37 MST