Re: [squid-users] TCP_HIT with Surrogate-Control? -solved?

I cannot get a TCP_HIT using the ESI spec syntax:
      Surrogate-Control: max-age=3600, content="ESI/1.0"
...but I can get a TCP_HIT by dropping the max-age directive from
surrogate control, and letting the Cache-Control tag set max-age,
like:
    Cache-Control: max-age=86400
    Surrogate-Control: content="ESI/1.0"

>From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
>To: Y Jones <yeattsj@hotmail.com>
>CC: squid-users@squid-cache.org
>Subject: Re: [squid-users] TCP_HIT with Surrogate-Control? -related to
>bug7?
>Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:38:40 +0100 (CET)
>
>On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Y Jones wrote:
>
> > It seems like even though squid does not update the cache with
> > headers from a 304 reply as recorded here:
> > http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=7
> > It should still obey the max-age directive for Surrogate-Control,
> > shouldn't it?
>
>It should.
>
>Regards
>Henrik
>

_________________________________________________________________
Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95.
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)
Received on Wed Nov 12 2003 - 09:56:30 MST