On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:26:38AM +0700, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 07:56, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Payal Rathod wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the mail. Well, I have only one proxy running, and webserve
> > > ris on 80. But I believe I mentioned port 0? What might be the reason
> > > that squid behaves taht way when port is set to 0 or none?
> >
> > It is not possible to use port 0.
> >
> > What I think is going on is that when port 0 is specified in the user
> > agent (browser) it connects to port 80.
>
> I suspect that when the port is 0 the browser disables the use of the
> proxy, thus going direct through NAT or normal routing.
I have put the contend of the squid.conf on,
http://payal.staticky.com/squid.conf.txt
My iptables rules state (from iptables-save dump),
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.2 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DROP
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.3 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DROP
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.4 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DROP
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.5 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DROP
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.6 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DROP
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.7 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DROP
Any ideas why?
With warm regards,
-Payal
-- For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles visit: http://payal.staticky.comReceived on Wed Nov 05 2003 - 22:37:45 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:21:09 MST