Pada 08-Sep-2003, aqil menulis:
> Here are the specs of the hardwares :
> SQUID:
> IBM Netfinity PIII 512MB,
> I am allocating 448M of memory for squid
> MS Proxy :
> Compaq PIII 256MB
>
> I made some speed access comparisons. The result looks like this :
> SQUID
> www.google.com : 15,20 seconds
> mail.yahoo.com : about 1 second
>
> MS Proxy
> mail.yahoo.com : 7.20 seconds
> www.google.com : about 2 seconds
I meant, while accessing google site, I just need 1 second using MS
proxy, and the double from SQUID...
Apology for having bothered you ...
> I repeat the trial a couple of times, but the result seems to be
> similar. Access from MS proxy is faster than from Squid
>
> What we want to do is to substitute MS Proxy by SQUID in the compaq
> machine. But I have to first show to people that the performance of
> SQUID is superior to MS proxy..
>
> Any idea and suggestion on boosting the performance of squid would be
> very appreciated...
> TIA
> aqil
Received on Sun Sep 07 2003 - 22:03:45 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:19:34 MST