Re: [squid-users] Squid, WCCP, and Loading?

From: Masood Ahmad Shah <masood@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:05:23 +0500

Respected Henrik,
If he is running WCCP then I think no need to block cache proxy traffic from
router for intercepting... because Cisco router does not redirect wccp
packets to cache that is in WCCP table.

-- 
Best Regs,
Masood Ahmad Shah
System Administrator
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|   Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan
|   Tel: +92-42-6677024
|   Mobile: +92-300-4277367
|   http://www.fibre.net.pk
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@squid-cache.org>
To: "Larry M. Smith" <squid-cache.org@fahq2.com>;
<squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid, WCCP, and Loading?
| On Monday 04 August 2003 07.52, Larry M. Smith wrote:
| > I am trying to set up Squid 2.5-STABLE3 as a transparent proxy with
| > a Cisco 7204 VXR (running IOS 12.2(6))and am running across a
| > maddening problem - works in test network, doesn't work in
| > production network.
|
| > will show the redirected packet counter incrementing, access.log is
| > logging client accesses, cache.log shows no abnormalities, and
|
| > barely breaking a sweat (squid taking < 1% of CPU), but the clients
| > never get pages and eventually time out.  Did a sniff of the
|
| Have you instructed your router to not intercept Squid's own traffic?
|
| Same thing in the interception rules on your Squid server? (but if you
| disable the interception on the Cisco I don't think this is the
| problem..)
|
| > The only difference between the production and test networks (other
| > than client load) is the production network is redirecting off of
| > atm1/0 while the test network is redirecting off of fa0/0 (and the
| > requisite addressing/configuration changes).  I don't believe that
| > to be cause of the functionality problem as in the production
| > network I do see the packets being redirected to Squid.
|
| If you see traffic in access.log then the redirection is working.
|
| If you have enabled interception and then normal proxying does not
| work then the interception is intercepting too much, preventing the
| proxy itself from doing what it should. Remember that the proxy is
| just a HTTP client like any other in the eye of interception rules
| and if the proxy uses the same router as your clients then rules is
| needed to instruct the router on what to do with the traffic.
|
| A very good test when verifying networing, interception rules etc is
| to start by verifying that browsing directly from the proxy server
| without using the proxy always works. For this purpose you can use
| lynx/wgetor even squidclient (just remember to specify host and port
| options to squidclient, or else it assumes you want to ask the
| proxy..). If browsing from the proxy server does not work then there
| is networking errors and proxying via the same can not work until the
| networking errors are corrected.
|
| -- 
| Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
| https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org
|
| If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or
| firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden
| http://www.marasystems.com/, info@marasystems.com
|
Received on Mon Aug 04 2003 - 02:05:55 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:18:34 MST