* Mike Meredith <mike.meredith@port.ac.uk>:
> I've done some benchmarks for my own amusement, and found that XFS is
> significantly slower at dealing with small files than ReiserFS, ext2,
> ext3 :-
>
> http://blackhairy.demon.co.uk/notes/fs-benchmarks.html
>
> Mind you I'll be the first to admit that the benchmarks are hardly
> rigorous.
Interesting:
http://conferences.oreilly.com/presentations/os2002/wessels_duane.ppt
seems to say the same
-- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de Charite Campus Mitte Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 AIM: ralfpostfixReceived on Mon Jun 09 2003 - 06:56:28 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:17 MST