Re: [squid-users] limitting squid cache!!!

From: Masood Ahmad Shah <masood@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 14:42:45 +0600 (PKST)

and what about heap LFUDA and heap GDFS, these also used FIFO tehcnique or
LIFE. I think better is heap LFUDA with both FIFO and LIFE + most hit
objects will always in cache ....

-- 
Best Regs,
Masood Ahmad Shah
System Administrator
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|   Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan
|   Tel: +92-42-6677024
|   Mobile: +92-300-4277367
|   http://www.fibre.net.pk
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Free Microsoft support: Retry, Reboot, Reinstall.
Henrik Nordstrom said:
> On Saturday 24 May 2003 09.57, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
>> Yes LIFO is 100% clear :) for squid.
>
> But not very useful for a cache or what Squid uses.
>
> Squid uses LRU, which approximates FIFO but gives objects which have
> produced cache hits higher priority to stay in the cache.
>
>
> --
> Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
> https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org
>
> If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or
> firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden
> http://www.marasystems.com/, info@marasystems.com
>
-----------------------------------------
This email was sent using Fibre Net (Internet Services Provider)
"Webmail !"
http://www.fibre.net.pk/
Received on Sun May 25 2003 - 03:48:28 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:01 MST