Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>> Actually with the peak load he is having (600 requests/minute -> 10
>> requests/second) the ufs cache_dir driver should be very good.. (at
>> least on Linux and other systems with async filesystem updates)
While Rob wrote rps but I assumed he too meant rpm:
>Seriously though, 600 rps is the, we don't know how those are
>distributed...
Slightly off topic: but where are you getting the 600rps from? I've
followed this thread, like most, with fascination, but the line he
posted was
HTTP requests per minute: 262.0
Or were you extrapolating from one of the other lines? Just trying to
learn....
thanks,
Adam
Received on Thu May 22 2003 - 23:01:36 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:16:53 MST