RE: [squid-users] squid with linux or freeBSD?

From: Lightfoot.Michael <Lightfoot.Michael@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 15:03:53 +1000

>
> > In the case of squid, it actually doesn't. Most cacheable
> squid objects
> > are small (< 2KBytes). They often only occupy a single
> disk block (<=
> > 512Bytes). With multiple cache_dirs you are allowing squid
> to manage
> > its own "striping" which it does quite well thank you.
>
> yes cache objects are small but the question is how big is
> your stripped
> size? is your stripped size suited for average cache objects?
>
Read my last sentence above. You are talking about fiddling with all
sorts of obscure things which may or may not result in performance gains
(and may break your system horribly if you get it wrong.) Doing nothing
and letting squid do all the work is just as good (if not better in many
cases.) Why bother unless you have nothing better to do than fiddle
with things? I get paid to spend my time on more productive things.
:-)

Michael Lightfoot
Unix Consultant
ISG Host Systems
Comcare
+61 2 62750680
Apologies for the rubbish that follows...

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This e-mail message and attachments may contain confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use or
disclose any information in the message or attachments. If received in
error, please notify the sender by return email immediately. Comcare
does not waive any confidentiality or privilege.
Received on Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:04:28 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:15:47 MST