On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 09:38:09AM +0800, fooler wrote:
>
> since you have 3 disks and that is the minimum requirement for raid 5, if
> one disk failed the entire raid 5 system fails...
Uh *hello*, not in any raid 5 that I know of. This is simply not
true, raid 5 is raid 5 - you lose a disk it will go degraded. Sure,
there is a minimum number of disks and there is an optimal number of
disks but in terms of data protection the capability will be the same.
> just go for raid 0 instead
> for maximum performance...
>
or just let squid manage the 3 spindles itself.
-- Brett LymnReceived on Wed Apr 30 2003 - 19:52:00 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:15:46 MST